PayPal Halts Personal Payment Transactions From And To India

PayPal isn’t working properly in India. eBay’s electronic payment juggernaut appears to be blocking personal transactions to or from accounts of India-based users. It is reversing personal transactions; transactions involving businesses are still allowed.

An understandable uproar today as personal account holders resident in India have been hopefully temporarily cut off by PayPal. I wasn't even aware that PayPal was relatively integrated with the Indian banking system which I am impressed about. But this does not surprise me.

Reading through the comments it looks like it is the Royal Bank of India the central bank who are behind it.

This is not the first time this has happened. The RBI famously declared E-Gold illegal.

 

TIt has been brought to the notice of the Reserve Bank of India that an impression is sought to be created among the members of public by some agencies/persons that transactions involving "e-gold", purportedly an electronic currency, are freely permitted in India and that "e-gold" has the status of a foreign currency. The Reserve Bank has also come across a recent pamphlet on the subject, circulated along with a newspaper, which states that non-resident Indians use "e-gold" to send remittances into India.

 

The Reserve Bank clarifies for the information of public that "e-gold" is not a currency of any sovereign state. Use of "e-gold" in any transaction is violative of current regulations in force in India. Members of the public, banks, money changers and other financial institutions are, therefore, cautioned against the use of "e-gold" as a currency in their transactions.

India has foreign exchange limitations. From what I was able to find quickly private citizens are limited to taking out $10,000/y. This is almost certainly why they were banned.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Students Design Neighborhood Currencies

Great local currency related design project. My favorite are the Little Italy Favors.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Confusion Over Where Money Lent on Kiva Goes - NYTimes.com

Kiva is one of those companies that has really captured the imagination of people here in the US. I have always been critical about it, in particular the lack of interest payments to lenders.

I believe it is not sustainable in the long run without interest payments to promote good business practices. Secondly I think too many of the Partners don't pass the smell test on being serious about microfinance.

So now we find out that the Kiva model has been essentially a fiction.

Kiva, a nonprofit organization, promoted itself as a link between small individual lenders and small individual borrowers like Maryjane Cruz in the Philippines, who recently sought a $625 loan to support her family’s farm.

But Mr. Roodman’s blog post said that lenders like Mr. Kristof were not making direct loans. Borrowers like Ms. Cruz already have loans from microfinance institutions by the time their pictures are posted on Kiva’s Web site.

Thus, the direct person-to-person connection Kiva offered was in fact an illusion. Kiva’s lenders were actually backstopping microfinance institutions, and since Kiva and other online giving and lending models pride themselves on their transparency, Mr. Roodman and others suggested it might better explain what its lenders’ money — about $100 million over four years — was really doing.

For something like KIVA to work and not be just another charity, it has to make it real. It has to be a real Person 2 Person lending site and not a person 2 NGO lending site. It has to be 100% transparent about everything. The way this works I don't know if you can trust repayment rates at all.

So companies make bad decisions. Charities also often decide to err on the side of a good story as opposed to the truth. However this could set back the success of real p2p micro lending sites several years and that is what I find most sad.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

CapCard: Opentransact with OAuth

Tom has made a great screencast showing CapCard running ontop of OsCurrency.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

CouchDB for Banking applications

Banks are serious business. They need serious databases to store serious transactions and serious account information. They can’t lose any money. Ever. They can also not create money. A bank must be in balance. All the time.

Comment on topic or styleConventional wisdom says a database needs to support transactions to be taken seriously. CouchDB does not support transactions in the traditional sense (although it works transactional), so you could conclude CouchDB is not well suited to store bank data. Besides, would you trust your money to a couch? Well, we would. This chapter explains why.

While investment banks readily have accepted all sorts of interesting new databases, modern databases are still not very common in retail banking applications.

CouchDB is one of the new generation of NoSQL databases. It is particularly interesting to financial applications because of it's core MVCC architecture.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

About

I am a Danish-American coding hobo entrepreneur. I currently live in wonderful Miami Beach.

My interests are in Ruby on Rails programming, Financial Innovation, food, music and travel. Find out more about me in my Bio.

My main blog is at StakeVentures.com.